<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open letter to Red Hat about your logo &#8220;similarities&#8221; with the DataPortability Workgroup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/</link>
	<description>This is beyond marketing, it is manipulation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-41281</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-41281</guid>
		<description>Wow, Irish Jim, why are you so angry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Irish Jim, why are you so angry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-41277</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-41277</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry Justin, but you're wrong. You clearly don't have an understanding of logo copyrights and trademarks. Talk to any copyright lawyer and he will tell you that the logos are similar enough to force dp to change. The logos don't have to be identical for them to be infringing. What fedora is claiming is SPECIFIC USE of the infinity symbol, not the infinity symbol itself. They have a symmetric infinity symbol tilted at a 45 degree angle with a letter inscribed in it. DP has a symmetric infinity symbol tilted at a 45 degree angle with a letter inscribed in it.

The fact that other companys have similar logos is irrelevant unless there has been a ruling regarding it.

In short, you're not a lawyer, you have no knowledge of the subject, so shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Justin, but you&#8217;re wrong. You clearly don&#8217;t have an understanding of logo copyrights and trademarks. Talk to any copyright lawyer and he will tell you that the logos are similar enough to force dp to change. The logos don&#8217;t have to be identical for them to be infringing. What fedora is claiming is SPECIFIC USE of the infinity symbol, not the infinity symbol itself. They have a symmetric infinity symbol tilted at a 45 degree angle with a letter inscribed in it. DP has a symmetric infinity symbol tilted at a 45 degree angle with a letter inscribed in it.</p>
<p>The fact that other companys have similar logos is irrelevant unless there has been a ruling regarding it.</p>
<p>In short, you&#8217;re not a lawyer, you have no knowledge of the subject, so shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-41091</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-41091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Kamisamanou&lt;/strong&gt;, are you seriously suggesting that the Fedora logo doesn't look as much like the Designers Network logo as it does the DP logo? Or the dosh dosh logo? I think it is far more extreme to say Red Hat has a claim on the infinity symbol which is far older and more widespread than the thought bubble.

&lt;strong&gt;@Amy&lt;/strong&gt;, I see their separation as commercial vs. non-profit.

But, the truth is this is all a moot point anyway because I agree with DP's decision to capitalize on the positive publicity by taking the high road. The debater in me didn't agree with Red Hat's claim, but the marketer in me agrees that argument doesn't play as well as a logo contest. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Kamisamanou</strong>, are you seriously suggesting that the Fedora logo doesn&#8217;t look as much like the Designers Network logo as it does the DP logo? Or the dosh dosh logo? I think it is far more extreme to say Red Hat has a claim on the infinity symbol which is far older and more widespread than the thought bubble.</p>
<p><strong>@Amy</strong>, I see their separation as commercial vs. non-profit.</p>
<p>But, the truth is this is all a moot point anyway because I agree with DP&#8217;s decision to capitalize on the positive publicity by taking the high road. The debater in me didn&#8217;t agree with Red Hat&#8217;s claim, but the marketer in me agrees that argument doesn&#8217;t play as well as a logo contest. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy J.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40866</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40866</guid>
		<description>Similarity is not the only important thing here.  Far more important is how likely it is that the average consumer would confuse the marks.  It is unlikely that someone would think that the Bahamas or an art gallery are produced by Fedora simply due to the similar logos because of the incredibly different product spaces.  However, it is likely that someone would think that Data Portability's logo is, because Fedora also promotes openness and is in the same sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarity is not the only important thing here.  Far more important is how likely it is that the average consumer would confuse the marks.  It is unlikely that someone would think that the Bahamas or an art gallery are produced by Fedora simply due to the similar logos because of the incredibly different product spaces.  However, it is likely that someone would think that Data Portability&#8217;s logo is, because Fedora also promotes openness and is in the same sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamisamanou Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40795</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamisamanou Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40795</guid>
		<description>I don't think the logo dispute involved the the briefcase part of the logo. The logo on the DP homepage is a lot like the Fedora logo. And to say the "thought bubble" they use is so close to any of those other logos is a bit extreme. I'm a member of DP, and I agree it's no fun getting a C&#38;D over the logo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the logo dispute involved the the briefcase part of the logo. The logo on the DP homepage is a lot like the Fedora logo. And to say the &#8220;thought bubble&#8221; they use is so close to any of those other logos is a bit extreme. I&#8217;m a member of DP, and I agree it&#8217;s no fun getting a C&amp;D over the logo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40777</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40777</guid>
		<description>While I agree that the logo similarities do not warrant any type litigation, RH just like many other companies are forced to protect themselves or give up rights to their own trademarks and or IP. The current laws which need to be changed encourage this type of barbarianism between groups who should not and never have any animosity between one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that the logo similarities do not warrant any type litigation, RH just like many other companies are forced to protect themselves or give up rights to their own trademarks and or IP. The current laws which need to be changed encourage this type of barbarianism between groups who should not and never have any animosity between one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: להוריד את הכובע בפני קבוצת &#8220;ניידות-המידע&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40694</link>
		<dc:creator>להוריד את הכובע בפני קבוצת &#8220;ניידות-המידע&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40694</guid>
		<description>[...] היות ומאבק כזה היה צפוי להסתיים בניצחון פירוס (לדוגמא: ראו רשימה של לוגואים אחרים שדומים לרכיב של כובע-אדום). ובמקום זאת יצאו בקריאה [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] היות ומאבק כזה היה צפוי להסתיים בניצחון פירוס (לדוגמא: ראו רשימה של לוגואים אחרים שדומים לרכיב של כובע-אדום). ובמקום זאת יצאו בקריאה [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40640</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40640</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chris&lt;/strong&gt;, I know they have a right to protect their trademark. I just don't think the similarities between their's and DP's are as strong as Fedora's and the other logos displayed above.

They have a right to protect, but they are not right about this defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chris</strong>, I know they have a right to protect their trademark. I just don&#8217;t think the similarities between their&#8217;s and DP&#8217;s are as strong as Fedora&#8217;s and the other logos displayed above.</p>
<p>They have a right to protect, but they are not right about this defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brentano</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40638</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brentano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40638</guid>
		<description>Red Hat is perfectly within their rights to protect their trademark. Think about it from their perspective for a second. If some group came along and designed a logo that looked a hell of a lot like the Jive logo, you know that we'd have legal on it in a hot minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Hat is perfectly within their rights to protect their trademark. Think about it from their perspective for a second. If some group came along and designed a logo that looked a hell of a lot like the Jive logo, you know that we&#8217;d have legal on it in a hot minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup/#comment-40637</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafluence.com/open-letter-to-red-hat-about-suing-the-dataportability-workgroup#comment-40637</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thank you again for your support, but Red Hat is in no wrong, actually they are in their legal right to protect their trademark when any other symbols appear similar in the public space.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You're welcome. I really believe in the work you folks are doing. I know they have a right to protect their logo, but as the above images demonstrate, their marque is far more similar to many others and those organizations deployed their logos sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thank you again for your support, but Red Hat is in no wrong, actually they are in their legal right to protect their trademark when any other symbols appear similar in the public space.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome. I really believe in the work you folks are doing. I know they have a right to protect their logo, but as the above images demonstrate, their marque is far more similar to many others and those organizations deployed their logos sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.623 seconds -->
